Ethic Statement

Nalisya: Journal of Science Education and Humaniora is committed to implementing high standards of publication ethics throughout the entire process of publishing scientific articles. These publication ethics apply to authors, editors, reviewers, and journal managers to ensure academic integrity, the objectivity of the editorial process, and the quality and credibility of publications.

The journal is guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, transparency, objectivity, accountability, and respect for intellectual property rights.

1. Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

The author must:

  1. Ensure that the article is original work and has not been published before.
  2. Do not submit the same article to other journals simultaneously.
  3. Presenting data and research results honestly and accurately
  4. Do not plagiarize, fabricate, falsify, or manipulate data.
  5. Provide proper attribution and citation to all sources used.
  6. Ensure all cited sources are listed in the reference list.
  7. List all individuals who meet the authorship criteria
  8. Obtaining approval from all authors on the final version of the article and its submission to the journal
  9. Disclosing research funding sources, if any
  10. Disclosing potential conflicts of interest
  11. Maintaining the confidentiality of research participants' identities and personal information
  12. Obtain ethical approval if the research involves humans and such approval is required by the institution or applicable regulations.

2. Ethical Responsibilities of Editors

The editor is responsible for ensuring that the editorial process is conducted fairly, objectively and professionally.

Editors must:

  1. Assess manuscripts based on academic quality, relevance, originality, and suitability to the journal's focus.
  2. Does not discriminate based on religion, gender, nationality, affiliation, or background of the author
  3. Maintaining the confidentiality of manuscripts during the editorial process
  4. Select reviewers based on competence and suitability of scientific fields
  5. Avoiding conflicts of interest in editorial decision making
  6. Do not use information obtained from the manuscript for personal gain.
  7. Handle alleged ethical violations objectively and based on evidence
  8. Make publication decisions independently based on the results of the editorial process andpeer review.

3. Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers must:

  1. Provide objective, constructive, and scientifically based assessments
  2. Maintaining the confidentiality of reviewed manuscripts
  3. Do not use information or ideas from the script for personal gain.
  4. Identify methodological errors or weaknesses and relevant arguments
  5. Provide information about important references that the author has not considered if necessary.
  6. Inform the editor if you find any indications of plagiarism, double publication, or other ethical violations.
  7. Refuse to conduct a review if you have a conflict of interest with the author or the research being reviewed.
  8. Complete the review process professionally within the specified time.

4. Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct

Nalisya: Journal of Science Education and Humaniora does not tolerate any form of violation of academic integrity, including:

  • Plagiarism
  • Self-plagiarism
  • Data fabrication
  • Data falsification
  • Manipulation of research results
  • Dual publication
  • Unnecessary collection
  • Authorship manipulation

Journals may conduct similarity checks for manuscripts before or during the editorial process. If suspected ethical violations are discovered, editors may seek clarification from the author and take action appropriate to the severity of the violation.

Manuscripts may be rejected before publication or withdrawn after publication if they are found to have committed serious violations of academic integrity.

5. Authorship

Authorship should reflect substantive contributions to the research and writing of the article.

Each author listed in the article must:

  • Make a significant contribution;
  • Approve the final version of the manuscript;
  • Approve the submission of the article;
  • Responsible for the parts of the article that are his/her contribution.

Addition, deletion, or change of author order aftersubmissionmust obtain the approval of all authors and be accompanied by clear reasons.

6. Conflict of Interest

Authors, editors, and reviewers are required to disclose any conflicts of interest that might affect the objectivity of the research, the review process, or the decision to publish.

Conflicts of interest can be interests:

  • Financial;
  • Professional;
  • Institutional;
  • Personal;
  • Academic;
  • Other relevant interests.

The editor may replace reviewers or take other action if a conflict of interest has the potential to affect the objectivity of the review process.

7. Research Involving Human Participants

Research involving humans, informants, respondents, or communities must pay attention to the principles of research ethics.

The author is responsible for:

  1. Obtain participant consent if necessary;
  2. Maintaining the confidentiality of participant identities;
  3. Protect personal data and sensitive information;
  4. Describes relevant ethical procedures in the article;
  5. Obtain approval from the ethics committee or authorized institution if necessary.

8. Corrections and Retractions

If an error is found after the article is published, the author must immediately contact the editor.

Journals may publish corrections/erratums if the errors can still be corrected without affecting the validity of the entire article.

The journal may retract if the article is proven to contain serious violations, such as plagiarism, fabrication or falsification of data, duplicate publication, or findings that are materially unaccountable.

9. Complaint and Appeal

Authors may object or appeal against editorial decisions by providing clear academic reasons and relevant evidence.

Any complaints regarding the editorial process, review, authorship, plagiarism, or ethical violations will be handled confidentially, fairly, objectively, and based on evidence.

10. Editorial Independence

The editorial decisions of the Nalisya: Journal of Science Education and Humaniora are based on scientific quality, originality, relevance, and the results of the research process.peer review.

Publication decisions should not be influenced by personal, commercial, political, institutional interests, or relationships with the authors.

Ethical Commitment

By submitting manuscripts via OJS, all authors are deemed to have stated that the article meets the principles of academic integrity and is willing to comply with the Ethics Statement and editorial policies of the Nalisya: Journal of Science Education and Humaniora.

Nalisya: Journal of Science Education and Humaniora is committed to maintaining the integrity of the publication process and taking necessary action against any suspected or evidence of violations of academic ethics.